picked.
Log inPost a role
Category positioning
Ashby is the modern
ATS done well.
We replaced the ATS surface.
Ashby is the most thought-through ATS shipped in the last five years. The data layer is strong, the analytics make pipeline decisions defensible, and the team behind it ships. If your TA function loves data and runs a tight recruiter-led process, Ashby is a sensible choice. We are not in that category. We do not give the manager a pipeline to manage; we give them a vetted shortlist. The recruiter is not in the loop.
Post a role →Read the synthesis
Two shapes of hiring tool
Instrument the funnel. Or remove it.

Ashby is what you get when you redesign the ATS for a recruiter team that wants to understand their own funnel. The analytics are category-leading inside the ATS shape, the funnel-stage UX is considered, the customer base skews engineering-aware mid-market and late-stage. The buyer is the head of talent acquisition or a recruiter-ops lead. The pricing is per-seat, annual contract. Recruiters love it. The manager still reads CVs.

Picked is a different shape. We do not instrument the manager's funnel; we run the funnel for the manager. The AI screens every applicant by voice, runs the role-fit assessment, conducts a behavioural interview, and surfaces three vetted candidates with the full ranked list and the evidence per score. The manager reads three short profiles on Friday and picks one. The analytics that matter (the 4/5ths-rule fairness audit, override rate, time-to-shortlist) are published per role and per protected group on /trust/fairness.

Capability table
Per capability, per tool.
 
Ashby
picked.
Job syndication to boards
✓
✓
Applicant tracking / pipeline view
✓ (the core surface)
Different (top 3 + ranked list)
Funnel analytics dashboard
✓ (category-leading inside ATS)
Different (fairness audit + override rate on /trust)
Structured interview kits
✓
✓ (rubric per role family, native)
AI-generated JDs and outreach
✓
✓ (JD analyser at /tools/jd-analyser)
AI candidate summaries
✓ (recently added)
✓ (per-trait scoring with evidence spans)
AI screening conversation per applicant
✗
✓ (voice, adaptive)
Role-fit psychometric assessment
Integration only
✓ (Neuroworx IP, native)
AI-conducted first-round interview
✗
✓ (voice, behavioural anchors)
Manager-set spend cap per role
✗
✓
Free first 50 vetted candidates
✗
✓
Pricing model
$8k to $20k per year, per seat, annual
$0.99 per AI-vetted candidate
Buyer
Head of TA / recruiter-ops
Hiring manager
Procurement-friendly contracts
Yes (per-seat annual)
V1 pay-as-you-go; V2 enterprise tier with annual contracts
$8k to $20k
Ashby per seat per year, annual contract. Multi-seat teams pay multiples.
$0.99
per AI-vetted candidate, Picked. First 50 free, no subscription, no seat math.
Recruiter-side
Ashby is bought by recruiters for recruiters. Picked is bought by the hiring manager directly.
When to use each
Different shapes, different jobs.
Use Ashby when...
  • ●You have a recruiter-ops team that wants the strongest funnel analytics on the market.
  • ●You hire in volume and want a modern ATS UX with deep configurability.
  • ●The buyer is HR or TA leadership, comfortable with per-seat annual procurement.
Use Picked when...
  • ●The hiring manager is the buyer and the hire is theirs to make.
  • ●You want the AI to run the screen, assessment, and first-round interview end-to-end.
  • ●You want pay-as-you-go pricing tied to AI output rather than per-seat subscriptions.
See other comparisons
vs an ATS·vs LinkedIn Recruiter·vs HireVue·vs Workable·vs Greenhouse·vs Paradox·vs HackerRank·vs recruitment agencies·vs Workday
Skip the pipeline.
Post a role.
See the top three.
Post a role →Read the synthesis
picked.
The AI-native replacement for inbound hiring. For the hiring manager, not HR.
© 2026 Picked · Made in London · Three finalists in forty-eight hours.
Picked vs Ashby · Picked.ai