Eight frameworks. Each with a posture, a reason, and an escalation path.
EU AI Act
High-risk
Article 6, Annex III(4). Employment, workers management, access to self-employment.
We file a fundamental rights impact assessment per role-type. Human-in-the-loop is enforced at the dashboard layer: you decide who to interview, not the model. Conformity assessment ongoing. Article 50 transparency obligations met (candidates told they are interacting with AI, with the option to opt out).
NYC Local Law 144
Compliant
Independent bias audit annually; results published.
NYC roles surface an LL144 banner to candidates with audit summary, the 4/5ths rule outcomes, and the opt-out path. The latest audit report (Holistic AI, Q1 2026) is one click away from every job listing.
GDPR / UK GDPR
Article 22
No solely-automated decision affects the candidate.
We score and rank. A human makes the hire decision. Candidates can request human review of any score, deletion of any artefact, or a full data export at any time. We respond within 14 days; legally we have 30. See /trust/privacy.
Illinois AIVIA
Compliant
Consent + characteristics + retention.
Candidates in Illinois receive the AIVIA notice before recording. They consent or opt out. Recordings used only for evaluation; deleted on request or 30 days after role closes, whichever comes first.
EEOC · Title VII
Four-fifths
Adverse impact monitoring per role.
Every assessment is monitored at the role level for adverse impact across protected categories declared by the candidate (voluntary, post-decision). If the 4/5ths ratio drops below 0.8, we surface it to you and pause syndication.
UK Equality Act 2010
Compliant
Protected characteristics, indirect discrimination, reasonable adjustments.
Same monitoring framework as EEOC, applied to UK protected characteristics. Reasonable adjustments (extra time, dyslexia mode, screen-reader compatibility) available on candidate request, no flag against them.
California ADMT (proposed)
Tracking
Pre-regulatory, expected 2026 to 2027.
We are tracking the proposed California Automated Decision-Making Technology rule. Picked's existing posture (explainability, human-in-the-loop, candidate opt-out) is expected to satisfy the published draft. We will update when final.
SOC 2 Type II
In progress
Drata-monitored, Prescient Assurance auditor.
Type II observation window Q3 to Q4 2026. Letter of attestation expected end of Q4 2026. Type I observation window completed Q2 2026. See /trust/security#soc-2.