Mid-market, 200 to 1,000
/solutions/mid-market
Every manager hires.
HR sees the org.
At 200 to 1,000 people, hiring authority is distributed across managers but accountability sits with HR. The system gets caught in the middle: managers feel friction, HR feels exposure. Picked gives every manager their own pipeline, an audit trail per decision, and one rubric framework so the bar stays consistent. HR sees the org-wide view, the spend forecast, and the fairness report.
Post a role for freeSee the HR page →
org-wide view·manager-owned roles·audit per decision
What you said, last quarter
Three things mid-market, 200 to 1,000 leaders told us.
Mon 11:30
"The hiring managers do not use the ATS. They post on LinkedIn, message me the CVs, and expect me to sort it out. I am running thirty roles on a Google Sheet."
· Head of people · 380 people, fintech
Wed 16:20
"Three of our directors run their loops their own way. We hired two people last quarter who would not have got past stage one with our best director. There is no consistent bar."
· VP people · 520 people, B2B SaaS
Fri 09:00
"Legal asked why we did not progress a candidate. I had to go back to the manager, the manager could not remember, the candidate filed a complaint. I want this in writing the first time."
· People ops lead · 240 people, health tech
How Picked addresses each
Three answers. One pipeline.
Managers post their own roles, HR sees the dashboard.
Each hiring manager owns the roles they post. HR sees the org-wide view in real time: open roles by function, candidates in progress, spend forecast, time-to-shortlist. Roles are owned, the audit is centralised, the dashboard is one.
↓ Org setup
One rubric framework, tuneable per role family.
The same six-trait rubric framework runs across engineering, sales, product, ops, finance, and support. Traits and weights are tuned per role family by the manager and reviewed by HR. The bar stays where you set it, not where each manager happens to be.
↓ Decision engine
Audit trail per decision, exportable for legal.
When legal asks why a candidate was not progressed, you have the answer in writing within minutes. Per-candidate JSON, per-role report, all exportable. The audit covers the screen transcript, the assessment scores, the interview transcript, the rubric weights, and the manager's final decision.
↓ Decision metadata
What Friday looks like
Thirty roles,
one dashboard.
30
open roles across 6 functions
12
managers running roles
$8,900
total spend forecast, this quarter
0
candidate complaints unresolved
From the beta
"We were running thirty roles on a shared Google Sheet. The CFO asked for a quarterly hiring spend forecast and I could not produce one. We moved to Picked. The dashboard exports the forecast in two clicks. Legal got the audit they wanted. I sleep on Thursdays now."
HO
Head of people
380 people, fintech
Quotes paraphrased from beta sessions, May 2026. Named, consented quotes ship with V1.
For mid-market, the alternative is:
Greenhouse or Ashby plus three internal recruiters
$20k per year ATS plus $250k loaded cost in recruiter salaries
The ATS handles the workflow; the funnel is still the recruiter team's problem.
Workday Recruiting
$30k to $50k per year, annual contract
Enterprise procurement, eighteen-month implementation.
Mixed: ATS for some, agency for the rest
Variable, hard to forecast
The line CFO never sees the same number twice.
Picked.ai
$0.99 per AI-vetted candidate
One pipeline. First 50 free. Predictable spend forecast per role.
One pipeline. Thirty roles.
Post a role.
Friday.
Post a role for freeRead the HR page →
For mid-market companies (200 to 1,000) · Picked.ai