The honest comparison

Same role. Three ways it goes.

One hire, three tools. Taken from each company's own website, September 2026.

PickedJuiceboxLinkedIn Hiring Assistant
Monday, 9am

Starting the role

What the hiring manager does before anyone is contacted.

Picked
1sentence

Say who you need. Sam writes the role, you check it, choose where it goes and how people are assessed, then approve.

Juicebox
Yourun the search

Write a search in plain words, read the profiles and set up email outreach. Built for recruiters.

LinkedIn Hiring Assistant
+1licence

Needs LinkedIn Recruiter with the Hiring Assistant add-on. The assistant asks questions and plans the search.

Later that week

People respond

Who reads them, and what the manager sees.

Picked
0to read

Nia triages every applicant, Ada assesses them, and Theo runs a first voice interview if you switch it on. You see a ranked shortlist and why each person is there.

Juicebox
Allto read

Profiles and replies land in your pipeline or your ATS. Its site lists no screening, assessments or interviews: those happen elsewhere, or by you.

LinkedIn Hiring Assistant
Someto read

The assistant helps evaluate applicants, drafts messages and pre-screens interested people. Interviews are yours.

Two weeks in

Who do I meet?

How the manager decides, and what it costs.

Picked
$0first role

Pick from a ranked shortlist. Finalists book their own interview time. The first 50 candidates are free, then $0.99 each.

Juicebox
$99per seat, monthly, from

You choose from whoever replied. Scheduling and offers are yours. Its automatic agents cost extra.

LinkedIn Hiring Assistant
Add-onto Recruiter

Sold per licence, never more than your Recruiter licences. Scheduling and offers are yours.

In one line

Both help a recruiter find and message people. Picked gives a hiring manager a team that finds, assesses and shortlists, and only asks for a yes or no.

Picked vs Juicebox vs LinkedIn Hiring Assistant · Picked.ai